Use case · Agentic SDLC

Your backlog is bigger than your team. The fix isn't another chat window.

Copilots make typing faster, and agents in a chat window stop at a suggestion. Neither picks up the ticket, runs the tests, waits at the review gate, or writes the audit entry. Rollout runs the whole delivery loop — agents work tickets through a process you define, and humans keep the merge button.

ticket ready plan implement test PR human gate merged audit

Stage 1 · Dispatch

A ticket becomes Ready — and that's the whole trigger

Tickets live in Rollout's built-in tracker with their project, history, and docs. Delivery is a status machine over them: moving a ticket to Ready is what dispatches it to the fleet. The process is the board, not a convention in somebody's head.
rollout.dev/tasks · the working queue agents pull from
The agentic SDLC board: tickets moving through To Do, In Progress, In Review, and Done
Captured from a representative demo workspace.

Stage 2 · Execution

The fleet works it: plan, implement, test

A delivery workflow dispatches agents in sandboxes on your own Kubernetes. A planning agent reads the ticket and its context; an implementing agent executes the plan on a fresh branch; the suite runs before anything moves. Each step is a node you configure — prompt, model, tools, iteration caps — not a vibe.
rollout.dev/workflows · the implementing agent, up close
The implementing agent node on the workflow canvas: prompt, tools, and typed inputs and outputs
Captured from a representative demo workspace.

Stage 3 · Evidence

The run is the record

Every step streams into the run history as it happens — inputs, outputs, retries, durations. When a run goes sideways you read the steps, not a chat scrollback. Retries, timeouts, and history are runtime features, not habits.
Ticket → reviewed PR · run #229 · mid-flight
Run #229 mid-flight: the plan step complete, an agent implementing a ticket, each step streaming into the run history
Captured from a representative demo workspace.

Stage 4 · Judgment

Why a process beats a prompt

  • Repeatable: the same workflow runs ticket #9 and ticket #900 — quality doesn't depend on who wrote the prompt that day.
  • Inspectable: when a run goes sideways you read the steps, not a chat scrollback. Retries, timeouts, and history are runtime features, not habits.
  • Governed: sandboxes for execution, envelope-encrypted secrets, gates for judgment calls — the controls your platform team will ask about on day one.
  • Accountable: a human reviews the PR and opens the gate — and the audit trail records who approved what, for which ticket, and when.
rollout.dev/workflows · tests gate → PR → review
The back of the delivery loop on the canvas: the tests gate routing to a PR for review and the ticket moving to In review
Captured from a representative demo workspace.

Dogfood

The 22-fix day

June 10, 2026. We audited Rollout's own workflow engine, turned the findings into a ticket backlog, and put the fleet on it. By the end of the day, 22 fixes were shipped and deployed to production. A same-day adversarial review pass then worked the queue again and shipped 18 more. The numbers are from Rollout's own production workspace — the same loop shown above. The screenshots on this page come from a representative demo workspace, so we can show you the screens without showing you our own tickets.
22

fixes shipped and deployed in one day

18

more from a same-day adversarial review pass

1

merge button, held by a human

See your queue worked by a fleet

Run it in Cloud Pro or license Business for your own infrastructure. Add Design Partner implementation if you want the first delivery process built with the founder.

Prefer to talk it through? Talk to the founder

Want the numbers first? See pricing — exact software and optional implementation prices are published there.